How Good Is Your Science KQ?
[i.e. your Knowledge Quotient]
Science by Design or Chance?
In the field of observation,
chance favors only the prepared mind."
--Louis Pasteur,
1822-1895
Who 'does' science?
"Astronomers" were mentioned in written
English before 1400, "mathematicians" a few decades later. The chemist as a
"distiller of waters" began to be set apart from the "alchemist" in the 1500s.
The terms "botanist" and "zoologist" were devised in the 1600s and the term
"geologist" appeared in the 1700s. William Whewell, a Cambridge historian and
philosopher who thought a general name for a science practitioner was needed,
coined the term "scientist" in 1840.
So, what is a scientist?
He or she is one who delves
systematically into the intricate tapestry of our world and beyond. Some
scientists try to figure out how things work; others try to find new or better
ways of doing things. A theoretical scientist devotes her/his time to the
fundamentals or principles of a subject to reveal new principles or modification
of old ones. A modeler is a scientist who uses fundamentals or principles of
his/her science to develop mathematical data in order to make predictions which
are usefully accurate when compared to what actually happens in the lab or in
nature. An observational scientist gathers data from nature and makes deductions
based on that and other data. A modern experimental scientist works in a
laboratory and experiments using instruments and other specialized equipment to
create new understandings and information. A significant characteristic
separating the laboratory from the observational scientist is that the former
typically formulates an hypothesis, sets up experimental systems to test it and
must then perturb these systems in order to confirm or negate that
hypothesis.
Science discoveries; do they happen by design or chance?
The general idea in a research science lab is that experiments
should be carefully designed and controlled. The researcher is expected to have
a well-developed idea of what he/she is trying to find out or prove. Perhaps
because research scientists tend to have specific goals, they sometimes make
important observations peripheral to their specific study - but don't know that
they have made them, or have all the information needed for an important
discovery - but do not make it. However, discoveries do sometimes come about as
a result of the follow-up of chance observations.
Chardonnet, a young French chemist working on photographic
plates in his dark room one day in 1878, chanced to spill some liquid on the
darkroom bench. When he tried wiping up the spill some time later he noticed a
very curious phenomenon. Intrigued with the possibilities of his observation,
Chardonnet worked for the next six years with mulberry leaf pulp dissolved in
ether and alcohol to produce a revolutionary new product.
1. The substance Chardonnet spilled in 1878 was collodion.
What was the product he perfected six years later?
2. What polyamide, shelved by organic chemist Wallace
Carothers early in the 1930s as being of no particular interest, was later
playfully stretched along the lab corridor by some chemists in his lab and only
then recognized as having special, unique, useful properties?
|